🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of states are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that smartphones and networks are "robbing our kids' childhood". A law could be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have stated that an similar ban is "one of the measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to enact a proposal lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended parents to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a good starting point," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by robust data".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. One foundation founded by the family of a young person who was lost after viewing dangerous platform posts argues that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when users become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to create tools that are secure and age appropriate for young users," said a prominent peer.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, action is mostly unfolding at the local government level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures requiring guardian approval for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain politicians to copy Australia's lead, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of these regions, additional states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies adopt a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could backfire". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide discussion unfolds, the steps of Australia and others demonstrate that policymakers around the world are less and less willing to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.